Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 01:26

What’s next?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Are there any nude pictures of women with big tits?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
In what ways is Bollywood becoming westernized?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Prescription risk: Meds that could cause dementia - WFMZ.com
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Is gravity just entropy rising? Long-shot idea gets another look - Hacker News
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Thank you.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Free agent LB Germaine Pratt agrees to terms with Raiders - NBC Sports
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.